GET A FREE UA WOMEN'S CAP WITH EVERY PURCHASE OF 2 WOMEN'S ITEMS*
PINGGUL: Pada posisi kedua kaki disatukan, ukur melingkar di sekeliling bagian paling lebar dari pinggul Anda untuk memastikan adanya cukup ruang untuk bergerak dengan leluasa.
Ekstra ketat, seperti kulit kedua dan akan menempel di tubuh Anda.
Potongan yang lebih ramping dan atletis untuk memungkinkan pergerakan total sambil mengurangi bobot kain.
Potongan yang lebih utuh untuk kenyamanan yang menyeluruh, pergerakan yang leluasa, dan ruang untuk bernapas.
Anda harus login untuk berbagi melalui email.
After reading a few of the reviews I have to agree, what happened to your product?
I have 8 pair of your Original series UA 6 inch Boxers that I purchased over 10 years ago. I have since bought at least 3 versions of your UA Boxerjocks and can't say that any of them are as comfortable as the old ones. In fact the only time I wear them is when we go on a long trip and don't have enough of the old ones to get me through the trip.
If I could buy a dozen pairs of your the original, Retro UA 6 inch 2XL Boxes I would.
Your new version's don't fit the same and have all the issues that are listed in the reviews, waist band rolls up, underwear wedgies, material is not as silky, etc, etc.
I would actually pay a premium for the Retro Series as long as they were the same as the old version.
I bought many of these and in different years all of which are small(SM) in size. the first two was a bit loose and the following four are a bit tight. this time I bought some and find that though they are all in SM some are shown as sm 180/76A and some are 165/70A.
so obviously, this tells us the size scale is keeping changing? since they are private cloth I won't make any return. the tight ones would only be used when do some highly tense activity, and loose ones will be used as leisure daily gear.....
I have many UA boxer briefs and these have to be the worst of them! (I just went back and read the reviews and clearly others feel the same way.
The main issue is the waist band, they will not stay up in the back, it seems like they didn't put enough elastic in it or something, so good luck keeping your butt covered.
The second issue is the material, it is not as soft / comfortable as previous versions.
I am sure they were just trying to cut costs, but will not be ordering these ones again.
By far the best underwear I have tried and I have tried many. Worth the money.I still have the one I got three years ago. It's still in great condition
I was sweating a lot in my cotton underwear which made me feel drenched as cotton holds water. That all changed when i got UA's 9" Boxerjock's where the fabric wicks sweat away.
Just bought two pair of Heatgear. Discovered too late that there’s no fly. Won’t be buying these again.
5 years ago Underarmor made a perfect Heatgear underwear series. They were soft, silky, and fit perfectly.
This one is a weak imitation of the one they used to make.
I am severely disappointed I cannot find the older design anywhere!
These underwear are a Reasonable fit, cool, well vented and comfortable
These underwear used to fit very well. Now I don't know who UA is making these boxers for, but it's definitely not athletes. I'm a 36 waist and prefer to size up my underwear, but even the 3XL is too tight in the butt in thighs. The waist band slips down and the underwear no longer fits my muscular thighs in butt. These used to be the perfect underwear for athletes, but now they seem to be made for twigs and other thin guys who wouldn't know a gym from the back of their hand.
Equal in all respects to other brands costing more. UA succeeds!